I'm not normally into writing anything that could be taken as politics, heck I try as much as possible to stay away from the subject but today I ran across
TheTheologiansCafe, specifically a blog entry about whether African-Americans would mind being called black, say what?
I don't even know how I found the article but it got all wired up enough to write this, probably because I've been reading a lot of political stuff this morning that seems to have popped up in amongst the normally non-political blogs I subscribe to.
So here's the deal. Some guy, who I assume is a nice enough person because he wants to treat minority groups with respect is questioning why it is that when he uses the expression 'African-American' he occasionally gets emails demanding he use the term 'black'. Now before I give my two cents I should disclose that I am in fact white, with hints of suntan, but I am also African, and by an accident of history beyond my ability to influence, I am also European, specifically from the British Isles, which of course makes me Caucasian.
Back in the old days in South Africa I was also sometimes called a rooinek (red neck) by Afrikaners who themselves are Caucasian-Africans originally of Dutch or French descent. Rooinek was a term used for any white person whose family had only lived in Africa for a generation or two and who still went red in the sun as compared to whites who had lived in Africa for much longer and whose DNA had adjusted so they are born with a suntan, kinda like people from southern Spain.
Now one of the comments I read in the above blog was from someone who had to write a paper about the anti-apartheid struggle and Nelson Mandela, and he points out that his teacher (in the US I should add) ardently encouraged him to change black to African-American to be more professional. WTF, when did Mandela and the other 45million black people of South Africa become African-American?
Geez, why is this so hard, I have white skin, I'm white, I don't get upset about that, it's what I am. A friend of mine from Sri Lanka has skin so dark the sun doesn't even reflect off him, and most African-Americans I've ever met have actually been chocolate colored, in fact one guy I knew in the UK used to call himself 'chocolate drop'. The black (or should I be PC and say Bantu) people of South Africa are mostly very dark skinned, it's rare to meet a chocolate colored South African unless they are of mixed race.
To finish this article off, can I just say all these
labels are pretty f... stupid, and if 50 years of apartheid didn't already convince the world of that, can I just point out that
skin color is like so unimportant genetically, in fact in a few years time it might even be possible to alter your genes and change color, wow imagine that.
RJ said,
Wednesday, February 13. 2008 at 03:33 (Reply)
Carl said,
Wednesday, February 13. 2008 at 03:47 (Reply)
Jillian said,
Wednesday, February 13. 2008 at 06:10 (Reply)
Anywho, interesting post!
I get so tired of this argument. I think either name is correct depending on who you talk to. I don't really have a preference. Geez, there's so much other stuff to worry about why get hung on labels?
I hear ya!
I read your other posts as well. See? I can officially say you're an interesting guy!
Paul Dillinger said,
Wednesday, February 13. 2008 at 08:14 (Reply)
carl said,
Wednesday, February 13. 2008 at 08:44 (Reply)
@Paul, I've only heard about Detroit being a rough neighborhood, but I guess being part native American gives you the moral high ground a lot of the time, good position to be in.
Paul Dillinger said,
Thursday, February 14. 2008 at 08:29 (Reply)