Is cheap hosting worth the price you pay? If you're like me, there's a good chance you have more than one make money online website, and paying for expensive hosting just isn't an option.
I guess all hosting is different, and it's not fair to generalize, after all you might easily buy cheap hosting that isn't very good, or you could get a bargain with excellent service and uptime.
Personally I never pay more than $3-$4 per month for hosting, I just don't think it is worth paying more than that for my make money online websites. All of my websites need to make a profit. If they don't, they're no good to me.
And I think many of the people who read my blog are not rich, like me you have to struggle to make ends meet. Well, not me anymore. I use cheap hosting, and every website I own makes a profit. This is why I think cheap hosting is better than expensive hosting.
A lot of people I know tell me about special deals with unlimited domains and bandwidth for $6 per month, but in my experience these aren't worth having. Let me tell you why.
Let's say you have 5 websites, and they all make money for you. Sooner or later you're going to want to link them all together, but if they're all on just one host account they'll share the same IP address. That's not good news if you're serious about ranking in the search engines.
So, you'll probably need 5 different host accounts, and now you get it, cheap is better. Don't worry about poor service, just do your research and make sure the company you choose is big enough. I always send an email to any host company before I sign up, just to make sure someone will answer me. If they do, and I like their answer, then I use them.



Linda said,
Wednesday, November 25. 2009 at 18:56 (Reply)
Carl said,
Thursday, November 26. 2009 at 09:23 (Reply)
I can review the hosts I've used, that might be a worthwhile project, but of the two you mention, Namecheap or GoDaddy, they are both a good choice for a site that isn't terribly important. Customer service from both can be frustrating, and GoDaddy have a curious way of storing databases that means it isn't easy to backup your database. I guess if you have a low traffic site in a high paying niche you're not going to be too worried about some downtime, maybe a few hours per month, and these hosts would be fine.
And since the purpose of being an Internet Marketer is to be active in high paying or high converting niches, losing a few hours of clicks isn't going to hurt you very much. This is my reasoning. If a site is earning me $100 per month, then it isn't worth putting it on a $10 a month host plan. On the other hand if it's earning $100 a day, then it definitely is.
The reason I don't use a reseller account is that eventually I may want to link my money sites, and that works better when they're on separate IP addresses. Using a reseller account is convenient, but it means losing the ability to put your money sites on different IP addresses.
Bellamy said,
Friday, November 27. 2009 at 09:22 (Reply)
Carl said,
Friday, November 27. 2009 at 10:09 (Reply)
Rok Mejak said,
Tuesday, December 1. 2009 at 14:31 (Reply)
Q) Is webpage take more time to open (opens slowly) then this is in result of cheap webhosting? ma friend told me that this issues arises because of cheap hosing.
Carl said,
Tuesday, December 1. 2009 at 15:09 (Reply)
But even hosting that you pay $5 or $10 per month for is going to cause problems as well. The reality is that if downtime is a big concern then you should pay for business class hosting.
However I use cheap hosting for websites because I don't care if I lose a few hours of uptime.
Varna Webdesign said,
Monday, December 7. 2009 at 16:04 (Reply)